Searching…

Dog Space GIF by Nebraska Humane Society - Find & Share on GIPHY

Oops! We can’t find what you’re looking for. 🙁

Please check out our home page for the latest posts…

Fetch Home Page

Recent Comments

mike malzahn i think you mean 'doesn't'. yes us and the russians have enough nukes to destroy the earth several times over. but ww3 won't be between us and the russians. in fact the next big war won't be called ww3. glad to see you went from never to unlikely. good to see you learning there big fella.
WW3 · yesterday
Ronald Salter Making quotes don't make you smart are appearto be. You are silly little fella. The US and Russia both have enough Nuclear weapons to destroy the whole earth ten times over. That is what makes a WWIII very unlikely. No one wil[ win because there will be nothing left.
WW3 · 2 days ago
mike malzahn no one said you are a war advocate. but to say there will never be another big war is silly. the idea that a weapon is so destructive therefore people with it won't use it or even go to war is just silly and has been proven wrong throught history. gatling thought his gun would end wars. nobel thought the destructive power of what he made would end wars. those who don't know their history are doomed to repeat it.
WW3 · 2 days ago
Ronald Salter This blog is about WWIII. The first two were "BIG" WARS Involving major countries. The major countries today have Nuclear weapons. That is why I said there would never be another "big war". I am not an advocate of any kind of war.
WW3 · 3 days ago
mike malzahn small wars lead to regional wars, regional wars lead to big wars. how do you define a 'big war'? more than 10 million killed? a percentage of the population killed? was the war of the triple alliance a 'big war' to you?
WW3 · 3 days ago
Ronald Salter There will be repercussions for the Russians. The US will never be isolated, too many allies. But the subject is BIG WARS, bubba. We are talking about nations with nukes. You are all over the place.
WW3 · 3 days ago
mike malzahn "Whose resources are they just going to take without repercussions?" the repercusisons are the war. and the UN is feckless. again, see tibet, crimea and even the balkans. the US had to go in to stop the serbs from killing the croats and muslims. the US is going to spend the next 20 to 30 years as an isolationist nation, certainly not sending in combat troops. but we will give material support to fight china.
WW3 · 4 days ago
mike malzahn "Poor countries don't start unwinnable wars" you're hilarious dude. i guess you have never heard of the falkland islands war. lmao. so why were their so many wars in africa all through the 80s. "Whose resources are they just going to take without repercussions?" russia took crimea without repercussions. china took tibet without repercusisons. you do know that china is building artificial islands in the south china sea? you do know that there was just a boarder disputed brouhaha between india...
WW3 · 4 days ago

Oops! We can’t find what you’re looking for. 🙁

stars with a dead tongue

the nineties

perpetual notions

crossing fate

Policies

Archives